Literatur

Aus GMDS - Consumer Health Informatics
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

An dieser Stelle kann Literatur im Kontext der Projektgruppe gesammelt werden, um potentiell interessante Veröffentlichungen zu bestimmten Themengebieten schneller zu erfassen.

Health Information Seeking

  • Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS et al. Health information on the internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2002. (RAND Health reprint series).
  • Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001; 16(6):671–92.
  • Feufel MA, Stahl SF. What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? J. Med. Internet Res. 2012; 14(3):e87.
  • Jones R. Development of a Questionnaire and Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient eHealth Readiness and eHealth Inequalities. Med 2 0 2013; 2(2):e9.
  • McCray AT, Ide NC, Loane RR, Tse T. Strategies for supporting consumer health information seeking. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107(Pt 2):1152–6.
  • Powell J, Inglis N, Ronnie J, Large S. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011; 13(1):e20.
  • Sommerhalder K, Abraham A, Zufferey MC, Barth J, Abel T. Internet information and medical consultations: experiences from patients' and physicians' perspectives. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 77(2):266–71.
  • Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Damman OC, Bloemendal E, Wendel S, Jong JD de et al. Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12:101.
  • Bastian H. Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence-based health website. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73(3):551–6.
  • Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 2002; 287(21):2869–71.
  • Eysenbach G, Jadad AR. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J. Med. Internet Res. 2001; 3(2):E19.
  • Eysenbach G, Köhler C. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ 2002; 324(7337):573–7.

Health Literacy

  • Bastian H. Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence-based health website. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73(3):551–6.
  • Chan CV, Matthews LA, Kaufman DR. A taxonomy characterizing complexity of consumer eHealth Literacy. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009; 2009:86–90.
  • Feufel MA, Stahl SF. What do web-use skill differences imply for online health information searches? J. Med. Internet Res. 2012; 14(3):e87.
  • Nielsen-Bohlman L, editor. Health literacy: A prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Acad. Press; 2004.
  • Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. J. Med. Internet Res. 2006; 8(4):e27.
  • Zwijnenberg NC, Hendriks M, Damman OC, Bloemendal E, Wendel S, Jong JD de et al. Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2012; 12:101.

Readability Tests / Consumer Vocabulary

  • Chall JS, Dale E. Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, Mass.: Brookline Books; 1995.
  • Dubay WH. The Principles of Readability: Impact Information; 2004. Available from: URL:http://www.impact-information.com/.
  • Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L. A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav 2006; 33(3):352–73.
  • Gemoets D, Rosemblat G, Tse T, Logan R. Assessing readability of consumer health information: an exploratory study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 107(Pt 2):869–73.
  • Kandula S, Zeng-Treitler Q. Creating a gold standard for the readability measurement of health texts. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008:353–7.
  • Kim H, Goryachev S, Rosemblat G, Browne A, Keselman A, Zeng-Treitler Q. Beyond surface characteristics: a new health text-specific readability measurement. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2007:418–22.
  • Liu X, Croft WB, Oh P, Hart D. Automatic recognition of reading levels from user queries. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval; 2004. p. 548–9 .
  • Miller T, Leroy G, Chatterjee S, Fan J, Thoms B, editors. A Classifier to Evaluate Language Specificity of Medical Documents [System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on]; 2007.
  • Ownby RL. Influence of vocabulary and sentence complexity and passive voice on the readability of consumer-oriented mental health information on the Internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2005:585–9.
  • Rosemblat G, Logan R, Tse T, Graham L. Text features and readability: Expert evaluation of consumer health text. In: Mednet 2006: 11th World Congress on Internet in Medicine the Society for Internet in Medicine; 2006 .
  • Yunli Wang, editor. Automatic Recognition of Text Difficulty from Consumers Health Information [Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2006. CBMS 2006. 19th IEEE International Symposium on]; 2006.
  • Zeng QT, Tse T. Exploring and developing consumer health vocabularies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13(1):24–9.
  • Zeng-Treitler Q, Goryachev S, Tse T, Keselman A, Boxwala A. Estimating consumer familiarity with health terminology: a context-based approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15(3):349–56.